{"id":3108,"date":"2015-11-23T20:58:40","date_gmt":"2015-11-23T20:58:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/?p=3108"},"modified":"2024-02-08T01:06:09","modified_gmt":"2024-02-08T01:06:09","slug":"planning-accreditation-board-new-standards-would-eliminate-diversity-measures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/planning-accreditation-board-new-standards-would-eliminate-diversity-measures\/","title":{"rendered":"Planning Accreditation Board New Standards Would Eliminate Diversity Measures"},"content":{"rendered":"
As I’m sure some of you know, the Planning Accreditation Board (which accredits planning schools) is revising their standards, including the elimination of particular metrics around student and faculty diversity. This will be devastating to efforts to recruit and retain students and faculty of color in planning schools.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
We are trying to get the word out to as many scholars and practitioners as possible and asking them to support the POCIG statement<\/a>. \u00a0Please also review the POCIG analysis<\/a> of the PAB proposed changes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Thank you so much!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Best,<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Dear URBAN network, As I’m sure some of you know, the Planning Accreditation Board (which accredits planning schools) is revising their standards, including the elimination of particular metrics around student and faculty diversity. This will be devastating to efforts to recruit and retain students and faculty of color in planning […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4416,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[167,22],"tags":[176],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7HMh0-O8","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3108"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4416"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3108"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3108\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65797,"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3108\/revisions\/65797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbanresearchnetwork.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\narielb@berkeley.edu<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"